Search

Sunday, August 30, 2020

Los Angeles Billboard

David Zahniser and Emily Alpert Reyes at LA Times:
When a real estate developer proposed a $1.2-billion skyscraper complex just south of downtown, Los Angeles City Councilman Curren Price stepped forward to champion the project, despite warnings that it would accelerate gentrification in South Los Angeles.
Price urged his colleagues to approve the development in 2016, saying it would create hundreds of jobs. He also ensured that developer Ara Tavitian received permission to install three huge digital billboards on a 12-story building already located on the site, over strong objections from city planning commissioners.
Three months later, three of Tavitian’s real estate companies poured $75,000 into a political action committee working to reelect Price.
Construction still hasn’t started on the skyscraper complex, which would go up next to the existing building and add 1,444 apartments and condominiums, a 208-room hotel, a supermarket and other attractions. But the property owners have already installed the digital billboards, sparking complaints from those who live and work nearby.

An old, old Los Angeles story...

Saturday, August 29, 2020

Lobbying to Secure Universal Preschool in Colorado

Interning with Save the Children Action Network (SCAN), I saw first hand how an interest group influences policy change. A great example was my work with SCAN’s Colorado team, which was deeply focused on the passage of HB 20-1427 in the Colorado General Assembly.

Background: Governor Jared Polis took office in January 2019. His campaign platform included early learning, and he quickly championed full-day kindergarten legislation which passed the state legislature that same year. He immediately turned his focus to preschool expansion and in 2019 worked with legislators to introduce House Bill 1333—a legislatively referred measure to increase the tobacco tax in Colorado, and bring nicotine products under the same tax structure—including liquid vaping products. Revenue from the tax would be used to fund a universal preschool program in Colorado and fund after school programs. The bill was defeated in the Senate and did not advance.

A citizen initiated measure to increase the tobacco tax and bring nicotine products under the same tax structure was launched in spring of 2020, with support from the Governor’s office. Signature gathering for the initiative began in June 2020. However, the unexpected COVID-19 pandemic presented challenges to the campaign, and prospects for securing sufficient signatures were uncertain. With only four days left in the state legislative session, House Bill 20-1427 was introduced and passed with bipartisan support in the state legislature. The Cigarette, Tobacco and Nicotine Products Tax will move to the ballot in November.

House Bill 20-1427: If passed in November, this measure will increase taxes on tobacco products and initiate expanded taxes on nicotine products—including vaping products. Revenue from the taxes would be dedicated to tobacco cessation and education programs, and for the first two years, the tax revenue would go to the State Education Fund to support K-12 education.

After the first two years, beginning in fall 2023, the majority of tax revenue would then be permanently dedicated to a universal preschool program (run through the Colorado Preschool Program or any successor program. The program would ensure a minimum of ten hours of free, voluntary preschool to every child in Colorado during the last year of preschool. Any additional revenue would be used to support increased access for low-income children or children who are at risk of not entering kindergarten “school ready.” In essence, a universal and means-based program will be developed.

SCAN’s Advocacy: House Bill 20-1427 was introduced with four days left in a historically difficult legislative session in which hundreds of bills were considered and voted on in a matter of weeks. SCAN was in close touch with the Children’s Campaign of Colorado, and made aware of this legislation a week before it came to a vote by the Campaign. SCAN mobilized advocates through email alerts, phone calls, direct emails and other messages to turn-out constituent support for the bill. SCAN advocates generated 350 emails and phone calls to targeted legislators in a 48 hours period, calling for support of HB 20-1427. The bill passed.

Since its passage, SCAN advocates have directly thanked lawmakers through emails and telephone calls, on social media, and have submitted letters to the editor to local publications, acknowledging the leadership of legislators. SCAN is now planning next steps to turn out a yes vote in November. It is worth noting that in November 2019, SCAN’s Colorado State Advocacy Summit featured speakers addressing the possibility of a ballot measure to fund universal preschool.


Friday, August 28, 2020

PhRMA

A good example of "management domain" public relations (Cigler 186):

BLM

Today is the 57th anniversary of Martin Luther King's March on Washington and the "I Have a Dream" speech.

Maya King at Politico:
After three months of sustained public protest, Black Lives Matter organizers are stepping from streets and plazas into the policy arena. And they’re going big.
The BREATHE Act, a four-part proposal named after the phrase uttered by Black men Eric Garner and George Floyd while in police choke holds, aims to codify the movement’s core objective: redirecting federal funds away from police, prisons and other parts of the criminal justice system and into underserved communities of color.
“I think that we've demonstrated over time that we have the rigor and the relationships and the expertise to truly generate meaningful ideas into public policy solutions," said Jessica Byrd, a Democratic strategist and lead organizer of the Black National Convention, the virtual gathering of activists taking place Friday night. “And the BREATHE Act is the best and highest example of that.”

Lobbying Scandal in Los Angeles City Council

 In Los Angeles, there has been a major scandal specifically surrounding lobbyists and support for real estate projects. Most recently, a lobbyist plead guilty, but several other lobbyists have also been arrested as well as a current City Councilman Jose Huizar. This has been a developing story for several months, and directly intersects with lobbyists, campaign finance and donations, and City Hall employees.


https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-08-25/lobbyist-morrie-goldman-guilty-plea

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-08-03/jose-huizar-los-angeles-city-councilman-plea-corruption-case 

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-03-19/political-fundraiser-admits-to-delivering-bribes-in-city-hall-corruption-probe

Thursday, August 27, 2020

Interests, Positions, and Outcomes

For next Tuesday, read Berry ch. 2-3

Keep up with reflection emails.

Public opinion v. interests.  On many issues, does public opinion even exist?  What incentives do people have to pay attention to policy in the first place?


Interest groups pick their battles (Grossmann 164)

  • Why not weigh in on more issues?
  • Which battles do they pick?
  • Rent-a-Friend
Groups align with parties

Groups may be short-lived with a single-issue focus.

Agenda control: ""[I]interest groups may be powerful in part because they keep issues off the agenda, never likely to appear in public opinion polls" (Grossmann 173)

Influence Footprints and the Public Sphere

The influence effort may not aim directly at public policy.

Political domain


Legal domain

  • Lawsuits
  • Legal scholarship and argumentation
  • Judicial selection

Civil society domain


Management domain

Interest groups and COVID -- or, "never let a crisis go to waste."

Protest and Public Opinion

Jeffrey M. Jones at Gallup:

U.S. adults are more likely today than three decades ago to view several forms of protest as potentially helpful for improving the situation of Black Americans. Since Gallup last polled on this subject in 1988, there have been meaningful increases in the percentages of Americans saying that nonviolent protest, violent protest and economic boycotts, in particular, can help. Opinions on the effectiveness of legal action are little changed.
Americans are still most likely to see nonviolent protest and legal action as being helpful, and least likely to say violent protest is.
...
 Whereas Americans in 1988 were split on the effectiveness of economic action such as boycotts, they are now much more inclined to say it would help (50%) rather than hurt (22%) Black Americans' situation. Many companies publicly affirmed their support of the Black community after Floyd's death, but advocates for the Black Lives Matter movement called for boycotts of companies that do not support BLM efforts.
...
Black adults tend to be more optimistic than White adults that the various citizen actions tested in the poll would help improve the situation for Black Americans.
The two racial groups differ most in their opinions about the effectiveness of boycotts -- 69% of Black adults and 48% of White adults say boycotts would help. But White respondents are twice as likely to say boycotts are helpful rather than harmful.
Black Americans are modestly more likely than White Americans to believe legal action (74% vs. 65%, respectively) and violent protest (21% vs. 9%) can help. But majorities of both groups view violent protest as hurting the cause.

Interest Groups and CA Legislation

My friend Joel Fox at Fox and Hounds:
Californians across the state are living through, watching and reading about the devastation caused by the fires roaring throughout the state, already consuming about 1.5 million acres with still months to go before the usual fire season is over. Typically, major disasters trigger political responses in one form or another and the fires in the summer of 2020, especially if they are followed by expected fall fires, will be no exception. Support for Proposition 19 on the November ballot could benefit because it sets up a fund specifically to battle wildfires and gives a tax break to wildfire victims who lose their homes.

The fire fund provision is not the core issue of Proposition 19. In fact, it was essentially an add on late in the game but could become more prominent due to the destructive fires.

Background on the ad here.

Wednesday, August 26, 2020

Abortion Access, Trump, and Interest Groups

 According to the Wall Street Journal, President Trump is hindering access to medical abortion pills, and interest groups are fighting back. Due to COVID and efforts to decrease the amount of less-important visits to doctors, the FDA has loosened restrictions to access different drugs. Some prescription drugs can arrive by mail instead of requiring a physical visit to pharmacies. The article states that "the Trump administration, which opposes abortion rights, didn’t suspend the in-person pickup requirement for the abortion drug mifepristone. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [(ACOG)], an organization of women’s health care physicians, and other groups sued the FDA over its treatment of mifepristone, also known by the brand name Mifeprex."

According to its website, ACOG is a "professional membership organization" whose "activities include producing practice guidelines for providers and educational materials for patients, providing practice management and career support, facilitating programs and initiatives aimed at improving women’s health, and advocating on behalf of members and patients."

Drawing on Tuesday's definitions of the types of interest groups––economic and non-economic––ACOG seems to be a hybrid of the two types. On one hand, members of the group gain tangible economic benefits (career support) but also engage in non-economic advocacy work (women's rights). One could argue that these doctors benefit economically from abortion accessibility when paid to perform abortions, but ACOG claims to also be an advocacy organization for women's health. In this particular instance with an abortion medication, doctors do not benefit as much as compared to being paid to directly perform an abortion. However, this article makes me wonder––how hard is it for economic interest groups to disguise their self-interested actions behind "public interest" advocacy? It seems pretty easy to have deceptive intentions.

Tuesday, August 25, 2020

In the Beginning

What are interest groups?

Federalist 10:
The latent causes of faction are thus sown in the nature of man; and we see them everywhere brought into different degrees of activity, according to the different circumstances of civil society. A zeal for different opinions concerning religion, concerning government, and many other points, as well of speculation as of practice; an attachment to different leaders ambitiously contending for pre-eminence and power ... But the most common and durable source of factions has been the various and unequal distribution of property. Those who hold and those who are without property have ever formed distinct interests in society. Those who are creditors, and those who are debtors, fall under a like discrimination. A landed interest, a manufacturing interest, a mercantile interest, a moneyed interest, with many lesser interests, grow up of necessity in civilized nations, and divide them into different classes, actuated by different sentiments and views. The regulation of these various and interfering interests forms the principal task of modern legislation, and involves the spirit of party and faction in the necessary and ordinary operations of the government.
Just about every potential interest group has an organization -- even registered sex offenders.

The First Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Mine Workers v. Illinois Bar Assn.  389 U.S. 217 (1967)
We start with the premise that the rights to assemble peaceably and to petition for a redress of grievances are among the most precious of the liberties safeguarded by the Bill of Rights. These rights, moreover, are intimately connected, both in origin and in purpose, with the other First Amendment rights of free speech and free press. "All these, though not identical, are inseparable."Thomas v. Collins, 323 U. S. 516323 U. S. 530 (1945). See De Jones v. Oregon, 299 U. S. 353299 U. S. 364 (1937). The First Amendment would, however, be a hollow promise if it left government free to destroy or erode its guarantees by indirect restraints so long as no law is passed that prohibits free speech, press, petition, or assembly as such. We have therefore repeatedly held that laws which actually affect the exercise of these vital rights cannot be sustained merely because they were enacted for the purpose of dealing with some evil within the State's legislative competence, or even because the laws do, in fact, provide a helpful means of dealing with such an evil. Schneider v. State, 308 U. S. 147 (1939); Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U. S. 296 (1940).
Types of Interest groups

Economic–openly seek material gain for own members

  • Corporations
  • Trade and professional associations3.
  • Labor unions and federations

.Non-economic: public interest, membership

  • Advocacy groups
  • Think tank
  • .Foundations--upstream fundingwhyWhat to they do?

  • "Inside" lobbying Some data
  • "Outside lobbying" and public relations  -- will post an example for discussion next time!
  • Legal Action
  • Campaign Finance


DO NOT REDUCE INTEREST GROUP INFLUENCE TO CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS-

Why do people join?  Three types of motives


  • Material
  • Puirposive -- the role of threats
  • Solidary



Tuesday, August 11, 2020

The Revolving Door: Staffing Campaigns and Bureaucracies

Interest groups can exert influence via personnel.

David McCabe and Kenneth P. Vogel at NY Times:
Joseph R. Biden Jr. has been critical of Big Tech, admonishing Facebook for mishandling misinformation and saying internet companies should lose a central legal protection.
But his campaign has quietly welcomed onto its staff and policy groups people who have worked with or for Silicon Valley giants, raising concerns among the industry’s critics that the companies are seeking to co-opt a potential Biden administration.
One of Mr. Biden’s closest aides joined the campaign from Apple, while others held senior roles at firms that consulted for major tech companies. And a nearly 700-person volunteer group advising the campaign, the Innovation Policy Committee, includes at least eight people who work for Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple, according to documents reviewed by The New York Times. Other committee members have close ties to the companies, including economists and lawyers who have advised them, and officials at think tanks funded by them.
The group’s members also include some prominent progressives arguing for stiffer regulation of tech. But the presence of the industry’s allies inside Mr. Biden’s policy apparatus and campaign and transition teams — and his campaign’s effort to ensure the confidentiality of its policy process — has alarmed an increasingly influential coalition of liberals who say the tech titans stifle competition, disregard user privacy and fail to adequately police hate speech and disinformation.
They are hoping to dissuade Mr. Biden, who has not made tech issues a major focus of his campaign, from following the example of his former boss, President Barack Obama, whose embrace of tech companies helped turn them into darlings in Washington.

Saturday, August 8, 2020

Gov 106 Syllabus, Fall 2020

The Politics of Interest Groups
CMC Government 106, Fall 2020
Tuesday and Thursday 11AM-12:15 PM Pacific
Office Hours: by appointment

J.J. Pitney
Office: Kravis 232 Telephone: 909/607-4224
E-mail: jpitney@cmc.edu

General


This course examines the role of interest groups in American politics, with particular attention to their influence on public policy.  It asks these questions:

  • What are interest groups, and how do they form?
  • Are there real differences between economic and "public" interest groups?
  • How do interest groups try to influence elections?
  • By what legal and extralegal means do foreign interests play a part in American politics?
  • What strategies and tactics do they use in the "outside" game of public relations and the "inside game" of lobbying?
  • Is there a general public interest apart from group interests?  If so, do interest groups advance or undercut it?
Classes


Classes will include lecture and discussion.  Finish the readings before class because our discussions will involve those readings.  We shall also talk about breaking news, so you must read a good news source such as PoliticoRealClearPolitics or the New York Times

Blog

Our class blog is right here at http://gov106.blogspot.com.  I shall post videos, graphs, news stories, and other material there.  We shall use some of this material in class, and you may review the rest at your convenience.   You will all receive invitations to post to the blog.  (Please let me know if you do not get such an invitation.)  I strongly encourage you to use the blog in these ways:
  • To post questions or comments about the readings before we discuss them in class;
  • To follow up on class discussions with additional comments or questions.
  • To post relevant news items or videos.
    Grades

    The following will make up your course grade:

    • Three 4-page essays: 20% each
    • One research paper: 25%
    • Class participation, weekly writeups: 15%
       Details
      • The papers will develop your research and writing skills, and test your comprehension of class materials  In grading your papers, I will take account of the quality of your writing, applying the principles of Strunk and White’s Elements of StyleIf you object to this approach, do not take this course, or anything else that I teach.  
      • The research paper will enable you to delve into scholarly and primary sources.  Students will make brief oral presentations on their topics.
      • Class participation will hone your ability to think on your feet, as I shall call on students at random.  If you often miss class or fail to prepare, your grade will suffer.  I shall use the cold calls to judge how well you are keeping up with the material.  If you object to this approach, do not take this course.  I also expect you to post relevant content to the blog.  Each week, you shall email me a brief reflection on the readings.
      • In addition to the required readings (below), I may also give you emails and web links covering current events and basic factual information.  
      • Because constructive disagreement sharpens thinking, deepens understanding, and reveals novel insights, I encourage and expect it.  All viewpoints are welcome here, and no ideas are immune from scrutiny and debate. Your opinions will not affect your grade, as long as you can back up what you say.
      • As a courtesy to your fellow students, please log in on time.
      • Check due dates.  Plan your schedule accordingly.   Do not plan on extensions.  
      • Plagiarism is not a victimless offense, because it hurts fellow students.  Please study our Statement of Academic Integrity, which reads in part:  "The faculty of Claremont McKenna College is firmly committed to upholding the highest standards of academic integrity. Each faculty member has the responsibility to report cases of academic dishonesty to the Academic Standards Committee, which has the duty of dealing with cases of alleged academic dishonesty.."
      • Your experience in this class is important to me. If you have set up accommodations with Disability Services at CMC, please tell me about your approved accommodations so we can discuss your needs in this course. You can start by forwarding me your accommodation letter. If you have not yet established accommodations through Disability Services, but have a temporary health condition or permanent disability (e.g., mental health, attention-related, learning, vision, hearing, physical or health), please get in touch with Assistant Dean for Disability Services and Academic Success, Kari Rood, at accessibilityservices@cmc.edu to ask questions or begin the process. More details here: https://www.cmc.edu/dean-of-students/student-resources.
      Required Books
      • Jeffrey Berry and Clyde Wilcox, The Interest Group Society, 6th ed. (New York; Routledge, 2018).
      • Allan J. Cigler, Burdett A. Loomis, and Anthony Nownes, eds, Interest Group Politics, 10th ed. (Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 2020). MAKE SURE TO GET THE 10TH EDITION.  EARLIER EDITIONS HAVE DIFFERENT CONTENT.
      • Lee Drutman,  The Business of America Is Lobbying (New York: Oxford, 2015).
      • Henrik M. Schatzinger and Steven E. Martin, Game Changers: How Dark Money and Super PACS are Transforming U.S. Campaigns (Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 2020).  
      Schedule (subject to change, with advance notice). In addition to the readings below, I may also supply you with various Internet links.

      August 25, 27:  Introduction

      "The canal trustees quickly secured the expert services of Abraham Lincoln to lobby against the Havens' proposal for an act. This action tells us that lawyer Lincoln still had great influence in the House of Representatives, even though he had not sat there since 1842. And it is the first known proof that he ever acted as a lobbyist. " -- Wayne C. Temple, "A. Lincoln, Lobbyist," Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association 21 (Summer 2000): 35-43.

      Is everyone part of a special interest?  What is the proper role of organized interests in a democracy?
      • Cigler, ch. 1, 9, 10.
      • Berry, ch. 1.
      Sept 1, 3: Movements, Groups, Factions

      "The more government takes the place of associations, the more will individuals lose the idea of forming associations and need the government to come to their help" -- Alexis deTocqueville


      We hear of "movements," "interest groups" and "factions." Do these terms mean different things, or are they variations of the same thing?
        • Berry, ch. 2-3.
        • Cigler, ch. 2-3.
        FIRST ESSAY ASSIGNED SEPT 3, DUE SEPT 18.
        READ STRUNK AND WHITE FIRST.

        Sept 8, 10:  Parties, Campaigns, and Interest Groups I


        "This fundraising avenue is almost completely shut off for outsiders. It’s not that I didn’t try. Several times I was told by third house leaders I met with that I presented an `interesting campaign,' but because the organization `had a piece of legislation before my opponent’s committee the next day,' they could not be seen supporting my run with a donation." -- Pete Peterson

        Why do interest groups make contributions and independent expenditures in campaigns?
        • Berry, ch. 4-5
        • Schatzinger, ch. 1-2
        • Cigler, ch. 7.
        Sept 15, 17:  Parties, Campaigns, and Interest Groups II

        "Day 1, I'd sign an executive order that says if you want to contract with the federal government — I can't tell you that you can't spend or donate, but you have to disclose every single dollar that you are either spending or donating to influence our elections. Think about it. The federal government contracts with dang near every company in the country. Adding that sunshine and transparency will make a difference." -- Steve Bullock
        How have dark money groups and super PACs changed the relationship between interest groups and campaign finance?
        • Schatzinger, ch. 3-6.
        Sept 22, 24:  Lobbying:  The Inside Game and the Outside Game

        "Unlike the neighborhood bakery that wants customers to add their names and addresses to a petition for expanded outdoor seating, tech companies typically already know who and where their users are. It means startups can mobilize — or brobilize — thousands of people via a simple email or push notification to blast targeted messages to their elected officials, often with just a few clicks. It’s like astroturfing for the always-on, location-aware era."  -- Caroline O'Donovan, Buzzfeed


        Who are lobbyists?  How do they work? What is the difference between traditional "inside" lobbying and "outside" lobbying?

        • Berry, ch. 6-8
        • Cigler, 8, 11.
        Sept 29,  Oct 1:  Business I

        "Just got a federal issue advocacy text from... Joann Fabrics." -- Christiana Dominguez `01


        How did corporations and trade associations become players?  When do they seek public and private goods?
        • Drutman, ch. 1-5
        SECOND ESSAY ASSIGNED OCT 1, DUE OCT 16.

        Oct 6, 8:  Business II

        "[Tom] Daschle, a `policy adviser' to a range of corporate interests and a close confidant of many top Democrats, has become one of the most famous unregistered lobbyists in the city. In fact, his activities as a consigliere and go-between for business leaders and politicians, including President Obama, are so well known that among ethics watchdogs, the technicality in the law that allows lobbyists to evade registration has become known as the `Daschle Loophole.'" -- Lee Fang, The Nation 

        What is the relationship between business interests and their lobbyists?

        • Drutman, ch. 6-9.
        Oct 13, 15:  Foreign Policy, Foreign Interests

        "What did Manafort do for his money? All his clients, notwithstanding their abysmal human rights records, received foreign aid from the U.S. government. They wanted more. They hired Manafort to help them get more. Having more, they could in the future afford (among other things) to pay Manafort more to get the U.S. government to give them still more." -- Andrew Ferguson

        Who influences foreign and military policy? What is the role of foreign governments and interests? What economic and ethnic groups have a stake in foreign affairs?

        Oct 20, 22:  Public Employees and Intergovernmental Lobbying

        "Since their own services have to do with the functioning of the Government, a strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent on their part to prevent or obstruct the operations of Government until their demands are satisfied. Such action, looking toward the paralysis of Government by those who have sworn to support it, is unthinkable and intolerable."  -- Franklin D. Roosevelt

        How do government employees try to influence the policies of elected officials? And how American governments lobby one another?

        Oct 27, 29: Civil Rights and Protest

        "Get in good trouble." -- John Lewis


        How is protest a political resource?  How did the movement for African American civil rights serve as a template for other civil rights movements?
        • Cigler, ch. 4
        • Garrett Chase,  "The Early History of the Black Lives Matter Movement, and the Implications Thereof," Nevada Law Journal 18  (2018),  https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1757&context=nlj  
        • John J. Pitney, Jr., "Autism and Accountability," paper presented at the 2020 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. On Sakai.
        • Linda Villarosa, "Pollution Is Killing Black Americans. This Community Fought Back," New York Times Magazine, July 28, 2020, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/28/magazine/pollution-philadelphia-black-americans.html
        • Marie Berry and Erica Chenoweth, "Who Made the Women's March?" in The Resistance: The Dawn of the Anti-Trump Opposition Movement, ed. David S. Meyer and Sidney Tarrow (New York: Oxford University Press, 2018).  On Sakai.
        Nov 3, 5:  Oral Presentations

        Nov 10, 12:  Nonprofits, Religion, and Ideology


        "It is easy or give or spend money; but to do this to the right person, to the right extent, at the right time, with the right motive, and in the right way, that is not for every one, nor is it easy; wherefore goodness is both rare and laudable and noble." -- Aristotle


        How do philanthropy, religion, and political ideology drive organized political activity?
        • Cigler, ch. 5.
        • Steven M. Teles, The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement (Princeton; Princeton University Press, 2008), ch. 5  on The Federalist Society (on Sakai).


        RESEARCH PAPERS DUE NOV 13

        Nov 17, 19:  Reform


        Can we reform interest group politics while preserving constitutional rights?


        "Money, like water, will always find an outlet." -- Justices Stevens and O'Connor in McConnell v. FEC
        • Cigler, ch. 13, 15
        • Drutman, ch. 10.
        • Schatzinger, ch. 7
        THIRD ESSAY ASSIGNED NOV 17, DUE DEC 4

        Nov 24:  Reconsiderations

        "I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. As a result of the war, corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed. I feel at this moment more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war. God grant that my suspicions may prove groundless." -- Not Abraham Lincoln.


        In light of the political and legal upheavals of recent years, how will interest group politics evolve?
        • Berry, ch. 10.
        • Cigler, ch. 16