For Wednesday, Schatzinger, ch. 3.
Overview: the cost of elections
Context: compare with product advertising
Key points
- Campaign money matters, but it is not the only thing that matters. Do not try to explain lawmaker decisions simply by pointing to campaign contributions.
- Election money is different from expenditures for inside and outside lobbying. Do not confuse them.
- The rules for federal campaigns are different from the rules for state and local campaigns. We will talk more about state and local money next week.
- When candidates say they will refuse contributions from lobbyists, they are not denying that they will take contributions from the interests that employ the lobbyists.
- When candidates say that they will refuse contributions from PACs, they are not denying that they will take contributions from the people who give to the PACs.
- By definition, outside money (Super PACs and 501(c)(4) money) does not go directly to candidates.
- If you ignore these distinctions in your papers, I will know that you have not been paying attention.
Political Money
- ACCESS MONEY v. BELIEF MONEY.
- Compare NRA in 1990 with NRA in 2022
- Abortion
- For economic interest groups, a key variable is chamber control: consider insurance, casinos, banks
Limits
The Citizens United Effect
- The decision
- Speech Now and Super PACs
- Dark money. Super PAC money and dark money are different: contributions to Super PACs are not secret -- but there are loopholes...
- Colbert and Potter explain it
- Trends
Loopholes
- Bundling and "disclosure"
- McCutcheon (Schatzinger, p 30) and Joint Fundraising Committees -- examples from 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment