Read through the voter handbook for California’s November election, and a name pops up over and over again: Alice Huffman. As leader of the California NAACP, Huffman has weighed in with positions that critics say run counter to the historic civil rights organization’s mission to advance racial equality in education, housing and criminal justice.
Should voters raise commercial property taxes to pour billions of dollars into schools? Should they make it easier for cities to pass rent control ordinances? Should California outlaw the use of cash bail?
No, no and no, Huffman argues in the ballot handbook, where she is repeatedly identified as president of the California State Conference of the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People).
What the guide doesn’t tell voters is that Huffman’s political consulting firm has been paid more than $1.2 million so far this year by ballot measure campaigns that she or the California NAACP has endorsed. She’s been paid by campaigns funded by commercial property owners fighting the tax increase, corporate landlords opposed to expanding rent control and bail bondsmen who want to keep the cash bail system.
This blog serves my Interest Groups course (Claremont McKenna College Government 106) for the spring of 2023. https://gov106.blogspot.com/2023/01/gov-106-syllabus-spring-2023.html
Search
Saturday, September 26, 2020
Political Consultant, Civil Rights, Ballot Prop
I have said it before, and I say it again: If you finish this course with your idealism intact, you have not been paying attention.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment